Picture this: An ordinary Tuesday afternoon, and your phone rings—your mum, who’s always been fiercely independent, has been rushed to hospital after a fall. Emotions run high as the doctor calmly asks, 'Who should make her decisions if she can’t?' Suddenly, you realise there’s no clear answer—no appointed decision maker, no certainty. This scenario catches families off guard every day across Australia. Choosing not to address Advance Care Planning doesn’t just leave things unfinished; it hands over your life’s toughest calls to a strange system that might not know—or honour—what matters most to you. Let’s unravel what really happens when you leave this choice unmade, and why the default path is rarely the one you’d pick.
A Tangle of Rules: Australia’s Default Decision Maker Hierarchies
When it comes to who will make decisions for you if you lose capacity and haven’t appointed anyone in your Advance Care Plan, Australia’s laws are a patchwork of rules and priorities. Each state and territory has its own default decision maker hierarchy—a legal order of who steps in, from spouse to children, parents, siblings, and sometimes even close friends or carers. But “default” doesn’t mean “best fit.” The person the law chooses may not be the one you would have picked, and the rules change depending on where you live.
How the Default Decision Maker Hierarchy Works
In the absence of a legally appointed substitute, statutory consent laws kick in. These laws set out a strict order of priority for medical and lifestyle decisions. For example:
- New South Wales (NSW): The Guardianship Act 1987 (NSW) prioritises spouse or de facto partner, unpaid carer, close friend or relative (Carer Gateway).
- Victoria: The Guardianship and Administration Act 2019 (VIC) lists spouse/domestic partner, primary carer, adult child, parent, adult sibling, then others (Lawpath).
- Queensland: The Powers of Attorney Act 1998 (QLD) follows a similar order but with its own quirks (Queensland Estate Lawyers).
Other states and territories, like South Australia, Western Australia, Tasmania, ACT, and NT, each have their own take on the state default decision maker Australia system. The specifics can—and do—change as laws are updated.
Meet your Legacy Assistant — Charli Evaheld is here to guide you through your free Evaheld Legacy Vault so you can create, share, and preserve everything that matters — from personal stories and care wishes to legal and financial documents — all in one secure place, for life.
Why the Default Path Can Be Risky
Just because someone is next in line doesn’t mean they’re the right person to make your decisions. The legal hierarchy might put an estranged child, a distant sibling, or a new partner in charge—regardless of your actual wishes or family dynamics. As WMD Law warns:
If you don’t make your own legal appointment, you risk decisions being made by someone who doesn’t fully understand your wishes.
This risk is even higher in blended families, where multiple adult children or step-relatives may have competing views. Disputes can quickly escalate, sometimes ending up before a guardianship or administration tribunal, which may appoint a public guardian or administrator to take over (WMD Law).
Statutory Consent: The Law Overrides Informal Wishes
Without a formal appointment, statutory consent and health-care consent default mechanisms override informal preferences. Even if you’ve told someone your wishes, only a legally recognised decision maker has authority in hospitals, nursing homes, or with government agencies (NSW Ageing & Disability Commission).
Why Appointing a Decision Maker Matters
To avoid the confusion and risks of the default system, it’s critical to appoint a decision maker Australia in your Advance Care Plan. This ensures your chosen person—not just the next in line—has the legal authority to act according to your values and wishes, reducing the risk of family conflict and tribunal intervention. The default decision maker hierarchy Australia is complex, but with the right planning, you can stay in control.
Plan ahead with confidence — create your free Advance Care Plan in the Evaheld Legacy Vault to record your healthcare wishes, appoint decision-makers, and give your loved ones clarity, comfort, and peace of mind.
Guardianship Tribunals: When the State Steps In
When someone in Australia loses decision-making capacity and hasn’t appointed a substitute decision maker (SDM) in their Advance Care Plan, the situation can quickly become complicated. While each state and territory has a default hierarchy for medical and lifestyle decisions, these systems can break down—especially if family members disagree, or if there’s simply no one available or willing to step in. This is when the guardianship tribunal Australia process becomes crucial.
Guardianship tribunals—such as the Guardianship Tribunal NSW, the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal (VCAT), and the Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal (QCAT)—step in to protect vulnerable adults who cannot make their own decisions and have no suitable SDM. Their role is not limited to health care: they also handle tribunal property decisions Australia, living arrangements, and other major life choices (Carer Gateway).
When Does the Tribunal Get Involved?
- Family conflict: If relatives can’t agree, or if there’s a dispute about who should decide, the tribunal may be asked to intervene.
- No suitable person: Sometimes, no family or friends are available, willing, or suitable to act as a decision maker.
- Concerns about abuse or neglect: The tribunal may step in if there are worries about someone’s safety or wellbeing.
In these cases, the tribunal can appoint a guardian or administrator. If no family or friend is suitable, a public guardian Australia or a professional administrator may be appointed (Lawpath).
The Tribunal Process: What to Expect
- Applications and evidence: The process starts with an application, often from a hospital, aged care facility, or concerned relative. Supporting documents and evidence are required.
- Hearings: The tribunal holds a hearing to review the case. This can involve medical reports, family statements, and legal arguments.
- Delays and waiting times: Each tribunal handles hundreds of cases per year. Average waiting times can range from weeks to months, depending on urgency and complexity.
During this time, critical decisions—like medical treatments or property management—may be delayed. The process can feel impersonal, especially if family stories clash or paperwork is incomplete. As Carer Gateway notes:
Guardianship tribunals aim to protect vulnerable people, but their decisions are based on law, not necessarily on what families want.
Scope of Tribunal Powers
The tribunal’s authority is broad. In addition to tribunal medical decisions Australia, they can make orders about property, finances, and living arrangements. This includes administrator appointment Australia for managing assets, or a substitute decision maker court order for health and lifestyle matters (Queensland Estate Lawyers).
Ultimately, if you don’t appoint your own decision maker, you risk losing control over who makes choices for you—and the state may step in, sometimes appointing a stranger to decide your future.
Behind Closed Doors: Family Conflict and the Cost of Uncertainty
When no decision maker is appointed in your Advance Care Plan, the risks go far beyond paperwork. The absence of a clear, legally recognised substitute can leave families exposed to emotional storms, legal uncertainty, and fractured relationships. In Australia, family conflict no decision maker is a leading cause of tribunal intervention, with disputes often arising at the worst possible time—when someone is vulnerable and unable to speak for themselves.
Without a nominated decision maker, the scope decision-maker absence Australia covers both medical and property decisions. This means everything from life support choices to residential care placement, and even access to bank accounts, can become battlegrounds. Siblings may disagree, ex-partners and new spouses might clash, and even the most harmonious families can find themselves at odds when the stakes are high and emotions run hot.
As Queensland Estate Lawyers note,
Families can be torn apart by disagreement when no clear decision maker is chosen.
These disputes are rarely reported in the media, but anecdotal evidence and case studies reveal a surge in family breakdowns and legal wrangling at the point of incapacity. The absence of a decision maker can pit relatives against each other, sometimes pushing them into the hands of strangers—like tribunal-appointed guardians—or even the courts.
When there is no clear authority, enforceability decision-making Australia becomes a real issue. Hospitals, nursing homes, and financial institutions may hesitate to act without a legally recognised decision maker, leading to delays in care or access to funds. In the absence of proper record-keeping absent decision-maker Australia and an audit trail missing decision-maker Australia, it’s difficult to verify who said what, when, and why. This lack of documentation can escalate disputes, as each party may have a different recollection or interpretation of the person’s wishes.
Consider these common scenarios:
- Medical emergencies: Doctors must turn to the default hierarchy, but if family members disagree, treatment can be delayed or challenged (Carer Gateway).
- Property and finances: Without a power of attorney, access to bank accounts or property decisions can be blocked, leading to urgent applications to the tribunal (Lawpath).
- Living arrangements: Disagreements over aged care placement or home support can leave the person in limbo, with no one able to make timely, enforceable decisions (WMD Law).
These disputes can cause lasting emotional scars, financial strain, and even legal costs—not just for families, but for the vulnerable person at the centre of the storm. Without a clear decision maker, the risk of estrangement, stress, and unwanted outcomes grows. As the NSW Ageing & Disability Commission highlights, failing to appoint a decision maker can mean your wishes are not only disputed, but potentially unenforceable.
Practical Gaps: What Happens When No One’s There?
Advance Care Planning (ACP) is designed to ensure your healthcare and lifestyle choices are respected, even if you lose capacity. But what actually happens in Australia when there’s no appointed medical or property decision-maker? The reality is that the absence of a clear proxy can create serious practical gaps, especially in hospitals, aged care, and urgent situations.
Medical Decision-Maker Absence in Australia: Real-World Risks
When a person loses capacity and hasn’t appointed a decision-maker, hospitals and care facilities must follow a default hierarchy to find someone who can legally consent to treatment or make living arrangement decisions. This process is far from seamless. According to Lawpath, “Uncertainty over who can decide can delay urgent care and increase the emotional strain on everyone involved.”
In practice, this means:
- Urgent medical interventions may be stalled while staff try to identify and contact the right person.
- Nursing home admissions or transfers can be delayed due to unclear authority for living arrangement decisions.
- Family members may disagree, leading to conflict and further delays.
Across major Australian hospitals, staff regularly encounter delayed treatment decisions due to unclear or absent powers of attorney or guardianship. These delays can have real consequences for patient outcomes and family wellbeing.
Default Decision-Makers: Expedience Over Preference
Each state and territory in Australia has its own default substitute decision-maker hierarchy. If you haven’t nominated someone, ‘the system’ will look for a spouse, adult child, parent, or close friend in a set order. If no suitable person is found, a public official—such as the Public Guardian or a tribunal-appointed administrator—may step in (Carer Gateway).
This statutory process is designed for expedience, not personalisation. The person chosen may not know your values or wishes, and their decisions might not align with what you would have wanted. In some cases, you could end up with a joint or alternate decision maker, or even an ‘administrator’ for property affairs, chosen by the state—not by you (Queensland Estate Lawyers).
Unplanned Scenarios and Systemic Delays
Imagine a hospital team trying to verify decision maker authority from distant relatives, or a backlog of tribunal cases where an ACP gap leaves vulnerable patients in limbo. These scenarios are not rare. Without a nominated decision-maker, record-keeping becomes patchy, audit trails are missing, and disputes over who should decide can escalate quickly (WMD Law).
For property affairs, the absence of an appointed decision-maker can result in a tribunal appointing an administrator to manage your finances and assets. This person may be a stranger, and their decisions are governed by statutory rules rather than your personal preferences (NSW Ageing & Disability Commission).
Ultimately, medical decision-maker absence in Australia and property decision-maker absence are actionable risks in busy healthcare settings. Health-care consent default and living arrangement decision default prioritise expedience over your values, leaving families and professionals to navigate late planning decision maker gaps under pressure.
How to Retake Control: Making Your Wishes Known—Permanently
When it comes to your future health and lifestyle decisions, leaving things to chance can mean losing control at the very moment you need certainty. In Australia, if you don’t appoint a decision maker through a legal appointment—such as an Advance Care Directive or Enduring Guardian—your preferences may be decided by default hierarchies, state tribunals, or even strangers. Fortunately, you can avoid these risks and ensure your wishes are respected by taking proactive steps now.
The most reliable way to secure your future is to appoint a decision maker in Australia—someone you trust to speak for you if you can’t speak for yourself. This is typically done through an Advance Care Directive (ACD), which is a legal document outlining your care preferences and, crucially, naming your substitute decision maker. According to Lawpath and Carer Gateway, this legal appointment is the gold standard for ensuring your voice is heard, even if you lose capacity.
But what if your first choice is unavailable? That’s where strategies like appointing a joint decision maker Australia, backup decision maker Australia, or alternate decision maker Australia come in. These options are underused but vital for resilience. By naming more than one trusted person, or specifying a clear backup, you’re planning for every scenario—not just the obvious ones. As Queensland Estate Lawyers explain, this approach can prevent confusion, delays, and family conflict if your primary decision maker is unavailable or unwilling to act.
Modern digital ACP services like Evaheld digital ACP Australia make this process easier than ever. With Evaheld, you can record, update, and securely share your Advance Care Directive and decision maker appointments in minutes. These platforms create a digital audit trail, so hospitals and tribunals can instantly verify your wishes and the authority of your chosen representative. As Evaheld notes,
Digital tools give families and professionals immediate access to clear instructions and legal authority.
Regularly reviewing and refreshing your documents is just as important as creating them. This helps prevent accidental lapses in authority—such as medical decision maker termination Australia or revocation no decision maker Australia—which can happen if your documents become outdated or legally invalid. Supported decision making Australia, where you involve your chosen supporters in ongoing discussions, can further reinforce your autonomy and ensure your wishes are always up to date.
It’s estimated that only 10-20% of Australians have completed a formal Advance Care Directive, but uptake is rising thanks to digital tools. Don’t leave your future to chance or risk an advance directive without proxy Australia. By legally appointing a trusted decision maker—and considering joint, backup, or alternate options—you can ensure your wishes are known and respected, permanently. With Evaheld digital ACP Australia, you can take control today and give your loved ones and care teams the clarity they need, exactly when it matters most.
Future-Proof Your Voice, Care, and Legacy with the Evaheld Legacy Vault
Your life is a collection of stories, wishes, and connections that deserve to be protected and shared. The Evaheld Legacy Vault provides a secure, organised, and shareable digital home for everything that matters—giving you and your loved ones enduring peace of mind across generations.
Take control of your future care and legacy today. With Charli, your dedicated AI assistant, you can easily set up your free Evaheld Legacy Vault to keep your advance care plans, essential documents, and family stories instantly accessible to loved ones, carers, and healthcare professionals—ensuring your voice and wishes are always protected.
Take control of what matters most — set up your free Evaheld Legacy Vault to keep your stories, care wishes, and essential documents safe, organised, and instantly shareable with loved ones and advisers, for life.
TL;DR: If you don’t appoint a decision maker in your Australian Advance Care Plan, your care and lifestyle decisions may be made by a default hierarchy or a tribunal—sometimes leading to family disputes or choices that don’t reflect your real wishes. The right planning, and tools like Evaheld, let you stay in control and protect your preferences, no matter what happens.
Share this post